تنوع تدفین ایرانی باستان در شاهنامه

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار زبان‌های ایرانی باستان، پژوهشکده زبان‌شناسی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی،تهران، ایران.

چکیده

در فهم مطالعات دینی توجه به سنت‌های زندگی بسیار مهم است. یکی از این مسائل در دین ایرانیان باستان، به ویژه دین زردشتی، نوع تدفین است. در دین زردشتی از زمان حضور ایرانیان در آسیای مرکزی و سپس ورود به فلات ایران و تا آغاز دوره پهلوی نخست «تدفین هواسپاری» بوده است. منظور از هواسپاری نهادن جسد در فضای باز است که پس از جداشدن گوشت و پوست استخوان‌ها را در جایی خاص مشهور به استودان یا دخمه می‌نهادند. منابع مهم در خصوص این نوع تدفین در کتاب دینی زردشتیان، یعنی اوستا و بخش فقهی آن وندیداد، منابع فقهی و حقوقی پهلوی زردشتی که مربوط به سده سوم و چهارم هجری است، گزارش مورخان یونانی و رومی و شهادت‌نامه‌های سریانی که زمینه مسیحی دارند، منابع تاریخی و ادبی  و گاه فقهی دوره ایران اسلامی، فارس و عربی، اجتما‌ع‌های زنده زردشتیان در ایران و هند، گزارش سیاحان خارجی از عصر صفوی تا قاجار و یافته‌های کتیبه‌ای و باستان‌شناسی دو سده اخیر. شاهنامه فردوسی یکی از این منابع مهم است با گستردگی و تنوع  بیشتری این سنت را ذکر کرده است. در این مقاله شاهد‌های شاهنامه آورده و با با منابع دیگر مقایسه و بررسی شده است. روایت ویس‌ورامین نیز اضافه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Variety of Ancient Iranian Burial based on Šāh-nāma

نویسنده [English]

  • Cyrus Nasrollahzadeh
Associate Professor, Department of Ancient Iranian Culture and Languages, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies , Tehran,Iran
چکیده [English]

For a logical perception of religious studies it is very important to pay attention to the life customs. One of these issues in ancient Iranian religion, especially Zoroastrian religion, is the type of burial which has been in the Zoroastrian religion, since the presence of Iranians in Central Asia and then entering the Iranian plateau up to the beginning of the 1stPahlavi monarch, "exposure burial". The latter term means  putting the dead body in the open air, and after removing the flesh and skin, the bones are placed in a special place known as  “bone-receptacle, ossuary” (MP. astōdān NP. stōdānستودان ). Important sources regarding this type of burial in Zoroastrian religious books, namely Avesta and its jurisprudential section, Pahlavi Zoroastrian jurisprudence and legal sources which are related to the third and fourth centuries of H., reports of Greek and Roman historians and Syriac testimonies that have a Christian background, sources Historical and literary and sometimes jurisprudential period of Islamic Iran, Persian and Arabian, Zoroastrian living communities in Iran and India, reports of foreign travelers from Safavid to Qajar era and inscriptional and archeological findings of the last two centuries. Ferdowsī's Šāh-nāma is one of these important sources.
 
Keywords: Zoroastrian religion, burial, exposure, Sasanian, Ferdowsī's Šāh-nāma, Avesta, Vis o Rāmīn
 
 
A part of religious customs and manners of thinking about the afterlife and resurrection seems to be manifested in the type of burial. In Zoroastrianism, burial is very important in this regard. In Zoroastrianism, since the presence of Iranians in Central Asia and then entering the Iranian plateau and until the beginning of the Pahlavi period, it has been  at first " exposure burial". Iranians had been using three types of burials on the way of migration until reaching Central Asia. These types of burial traditions were "soil exposure ", "cremation" and " exposure". Due to the dry and cold climate and the displacement of Iranians, the tendency to the tradition of " air exposure burial" increased. It is difficult to know whether the acceptance of this tradition was based on Iran's type of eschatological belief, or whether this type of tradition affected Iranians' eschatological and after-life views. Air exposure means putting the dead body in the open air, after removing the flesh and skin, the bones are born in a special place known as stōdān or daxmag (bone-receptacle, ossuary). Important sources regarding this type of burial in Zoroastrian include religious books, namely Avesta and its jurisprudential section, i.e Vidēvdād,  Pahlavi Zoroastrian jurisprudence, and legal sources which are related to the third and fourth centuries of Hijri, reports of Greek and Roman historians and Syriac testimonies that have a Christian background, Historical and literary and sometimes jurisprudential sources of period of Islamic Iran, in Farsi and Arabic, Zoroastrian living communities in Iran and India, reports of foreign travelers from Safavid to Qajar era and inscriptional and archeological findings of the last two centuries. Ferdowsi's Šāhnāma is one of these important sources, it has mentioned this tradition with more breadth and variety. The most comprehensive and important source in this regard is Ferdowsi's Šāhnāma. In terms of dealing with the long period of Iran's national history, especially the Sassanid part, the Šāhnāma provides a lot of detailed information about the type of royal burial of kings and officials. Because the Šāhnāma was based on the Sasanian era's Xwadāy-nāmag and some other written sources, its references to the ancient Iranian burial tradition are of the most importance. In the following, all the burial evidence in the Šāhnāma until the end of the Sassanid period is given. This evidence shows various changes over the centuries. Burial examples can be seen in Rōstam, Sohrāb, Alexander, Esfandīyār, Xosrow I and II ceremonies. Based on what is mentioned in the Šāhnāma about ancient Iranian burials, it can be summarized that the location of the daxmag was different based on the environmental conditions. The ossuary used to be made in a high place like a "mountain ridge", or in a garden whose head reached the clouds, or where it was far away on the road that even the vulture couldn't reach, and sometimes it was higher and upper than the meadow; Or like a long porch up high, they were built ten bows above and beyond [from the ground]. Sometimes it is mentioned that the coffin was taken from plain (Hāmōn) to the ossuary, which probably refers to the high place. In addition to the compound verb “daxmag kardan” :to bury [ossuary), there is also the expression "daxmag abar frāz kardan”: to make ossuary on the height. In Šāhnāma, daxmag, stōdān are used equivalently. Royal ossuary have been called "Xosrawānīg daxmag”: majestic ossuary, "daxmag abar ēwēn ī Xosraw": ossuary according to Xosraw's rite, "šāhwār daxmag”: regal ossuary, "daxmag ī pad kardār ī ēwān/kāx”: ossuary in the manner of porch /palace, "šāhānšāhīg daxmag": the king of king’s ossuary. The ossuary was used to be known as a place for eternal sleep: jāwēd xwāb. After the body was put in the coffin, the coffin door was closed tightly and the body was placed on the throne (golden throne) and the attendants accompanied it to the tomb. Then they would close the door of the ossuary and no one should have seen the face of the king anymore. After that, the attendants would return and probably close the route to the ossuary as well. The only case that which a ossuary was opened, was the case of Xosraw II, at the request of his wife, Šīrīn. After completing the rituals, the crowd would say "pad drōd (goodbye)" to the king or warrior and pour "musk and flowers" on the dead body. For the dead, they made a crown or a diadem of musk and camphor or Turquoise. The tomb would also be painted: "from red gold and azure". And the door of the ossuary was painted "red and blue". Its dimensions are large and spacious like a palace, and benches and sometimes swords, battle maces, belts, and armor of the owner of the tomb were placed in the ossuary. And sometimes they hired two guards in the ossuary. An example of that type is Shirin’s ossuary which is said to have been built for her as the "superior ossuary ", perhaps in a place higher than Khosrow II’s ossuary. Each king's tomb consisted of two identical and tall buildings with a gate, which was not a place of passage but had sufficient security. There was a writing or an inscription on the door and ossuary of the kings to commemorate some of the great deeds of the king and his treasure and army. The way to put the king’s dead body of the king in the ossuary was placing it on the "ivory throne" or "golden throne" and a crown of magnitude was placed on top of the throne. Sometimes the king’s dead body was put in an "iron coffin" or "golden coffin" and put “golden coffin and teak cradle" and "coffin" and put a "Chinese fine silk carpet" under the coffin and one side of the iron coffin was tarred. On the tar, they poured musk and perfume and covered the king's body with fine gold-gilded silk cloth. The tradition of mummification or waxing is also reported in Šāhnāma.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Zoroastrian religion
  • burial
  • exposure
  • Sasanian
  • Ferdowsī'
  • s &Scaron
  • āh-nāma
  • Avesta
  • Vis o Rāmīn
آموزگار، ژاله، و عنایتی‌زاده، ایرج(1396)، « نگاهی تطبیقی به دخمه زرتشتیان در ایران و هنـد و جنبه‌های آیینی و دینی ساخت دخمه در سنت پارسیان »، پژوهشهای ایـرانشناسـی، س 7، ش. دوم، صص. 93-108.
اخوان‌زنجانی، جلیل (1371)، «یکی دخمه کردش ز سَم اسپنور»، مجلۀ ایران‌شناسی، شمارۀ 3، صص. ‌666ـ668.
اسدی طوسی، علی بن احمد (1354)،گرشاسب‌نامه، تصحیح حبیب یغمایی، تهران: انتشارات طهوری.
ثعالبی‌مرغنی، حسین‌بن‌محمد (1372)،شاهنامۀ کهن پارسی، تاریخ غررالسیر، ترجمه: محمد روحانی، مشهد: دانشگاه فردوسی.
جم‌زاده، پریوش (1369)، «تدفین اسکندر به روایت فردوسی و تزیینات هخامنشی آن»، مجلۀ ایران‌شناسی، شمارۀ 8، صص. 829ـ833.
حیدری، حسن (1399)، «در دخمه را کرد سرخ و کبود»، متن‌پژوهی ادبی، سال 24، ش. 84، صص. 243-263.
خالقی مطلق، جلال (1357)، «یکی دخمه کردش ز سم ستور»، نشریۀ دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه آذربادگان، شمارۀ 124، صص. 462ـ470.
خالقی‌مطلق، جلال (1386)،شاهنامه، دایره‌المعارف بزرگ اسلامی.
خالقی‌مطلق، جلال (1389)،یادداشت‌های شاهنامه (با اصلاحات و افزوده‌ها)، جلد نهم، بخش یکم، تهران: مرکز دایره‌المعارف بزرگ اسلامی.
خالقی مطلق، جلال (1394)،شاهنامه، تهران: سخن.
دوفوشه‌کور، شارل هانری (1377)، اخلاقیات و مفاهیم اخلاقی در ادبیات فارسی از سدۀ سوم تاسدۀ هفتم هجری، ترجمۀ محمدعلی امیرمعزی و عبدالمحمد روح‌بخشان، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
شاکد، شائول (۱۳۸7)،تحول ثنویت، تنوع آرای دینی در عصر ساسانی، ترجمه: سید احمدرضا قائم‌مقامی، تهران: نشر ماهی.
شفیعی کدکنی، محمدرضا (1374)، «یکی دخمه کردش ز سم ستور»، کلک، شمارۀ 68ـ70، صص. 17ـ31.
شهبازی، علیرضا شاپور(1389)،تاریخ ساسانیان، ترجمۀ بخش ساسانیان از کتاب تاریخ طبری و مقایسۀ آن با تاریخ بلعمی، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
صدیقیان، مهین‌دخت (1386)،فرهنگ اساطیری - حماسی ایران به روایت منابع بعد از اسلام: پیشدادیان، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
قابوس بن وشمگیر بن زیار، عنصرالمعالی کیکاووس بن اسکندر بن (1373)، قابوسنامه، به اهتمام و تصحیح: غلام‌حسین یوسفی، تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
گرگانی، فخرالدین اسعد (1386)،ویس و رامین، با مقدمه و تصحیح و تحشیه: محمد روشن، تهران: صدای معاصر.
متینی، جلال(1371)، «یکی دخمه کردش ز سم ستور»، مجلۀ ایران‌شناسی، شمارۀ 4، صص. 878ـ879.
مجمل‌التواریخ و القصص(1318). تالیف 520 هجری، به تصحیح محمد‌تقی بهار، تهران: کلاله خاور.
محجوب، محمدجعفر (1361)، «گور بهرام گور»، ایران‌نامه، شمارۀ 2، صص. 147ـ163.
مَقدِسی، محمد بن طاهر (1374)، آفرینش و تاریخ، مجلد اول تا سوم، مقدمه، ترجمه، تعلیقات محمدرضا شفیعی کدکنی، تهران: آگه.
نصراله‌زاده، سیروس (1398)،کتیبه‌های خصوصی فارسی میانه ساسانی و پساساسانی (گورنوشته، یادبودی)، جلد اول: متن، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
ولی‌زاده، امیر و طرفداری، منصور (1399)، « آیین دخمه‌سپاری و وجه تمایز آن با دخمه‌گذاری زرتشتیان با تکیه ‌بر توصیفات شاهنامه و مدارک باستان‌شناسی»، پژوهش‌نامه انجمن ایرانی تاریخ، سال یازدهم، ش. 44، صص. 149-184.
 
Basirov, Oric(2015), “Proselytisation and Exposure of the Dead, Two Christian Calumnies Commonly raised against the Sasanians”, Faszination Iran Beiträgezur Religion, Geschichte und Kunst des Alten Iran, Gedenkschrift fürKlaus Schippmann, Herausgegeben von Shervin Farridnejad, Rika Gyselen und Anke Joisten-Pruschke, Wiesbaden, pp. 1-25.
Basirov, Oric(1995),The Evolution of the Zoroastrian Funerary Cult in Western Iran, An Unpublished Thesis, Department of Art and Archaelogy School of Oriental and African Studies University of London.
de Blois, Francois. (1994), “A Tomb of Horses' Hooves”, Bulletin Asia Institute 7, pp. 31-34.
Monchi-Zadeh, Davoud(1975),Topographisch–historische Studien zum iranischn Nationalepos, Wiesbaden.
Shabazi, Alireza Shapour (1975),The Irano-Lycian Monuments, The Principal antiquities of Xanthos and its region as evidence for aspects of Achaemenid Lycia, Institute of Achaemenid Research Publications, Tehran.